| Topic: | Re:Re: human centipedes | |
| Posted by: | Michael Robinson | |
| Date/Time: | 05/02/25 10:09:00 |
| Yet again Jeremy... - you don't know what the traffic volumes were before the measures went in. - you don't know what the traffic volumes are now. Yet you still make claims about the change in traffic volumes based upon nothing more than a few glances of a fraction of a second. Not only that. Claim these few glances are 'statistically robust'. It is completely ridiculous. And you keep in inventing things. Like your claim "Why traffic is not falling as much as was originally promised by H&F" Please provide any reference for your claim there was a traffic reduction "as was originally promised by H&F". In the Road Safety Audit document that YOU provided the link to, it says "While this is likely to reduce the number of vehicles accessing Rivercourt Road, it is not known how significant the reduction will be". And then there is reference "expected to be dramatically lower". The word "dramatic" doesn't provide any quantified target. You may claim the word "dramatic" means a specific % but it doesn't, it is entirely subjective. So you are inventing that LBHF "promised" that there would be a specific reduction in traffic and you are inventing the change in traffic since the measures went in. I really don't know why you feel the need to keep making things up. Not only part of a virtual human centipede, you are like Walter Mitty. It is quite simple. You could find the levels of traffic before the measures by asking LBHF for their traffic surveys. That is what I did. You will be able to find out the levels of traffic after the measures by asking LBHF to provide their surveys, which I am sure they will be doing. I wouldn't be surprised if they do surveys in April 2025 given the ones from before the measures were in April 2023, so good practice to compare data from similar times of year. |