| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Tree Murdered for 'experimental' cycleway. | |
| Posted by: | Michael Adams | |
| Date/Time: | 03/12/21 21:14:00 |
| Tom Pike suggested " Well, at least that's clear. You don't think most cyclists actually mind taking long detours" I never said that did I ? They're perfectly FREE to choose. But as I explained to you before, if cycling is such an enjoyable experience, why should they mind ? What "still" doesn't seem to have occured to you Tom is that *any cycle track* on route one will still subject these cyclists you're so keen to protect, to vastly more pollutants than they would experience, should they choose a "long detour" instead. Clearly the idea that SOME cyclists at least could actually enjoy avoiding pollutants and traffic lights on these "long detours" of yours, has never actually occurred to you. But you go ahead and keep pushing your route one solution, for all you're worth. He then rather optimistically, suggested "I don't think that misrepresents you." Wrong again ! Snipped the customary "do as I say, or the puppy/kitten gets it" routine. Anyway don't say I never think of you, Tom. Here's one for your Christmas Present list. I hope I'm not too late https://cdctelecom.com/aidjhk-Tenths-th-Telescopic-&039;-Rectangular-31346/Test-Measurement-&-Inspection/ Once you've slotted it all together I think the general idea is to stop digging when you reach 8 ft below ground level. michael adams |