| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Average bus speeds fall below 9mph | |
| Posted by: | David Lesniak | |
| Date/Time: | 09/01/26 10:30:00 |
| Oh please, Andrew. Connect the dots. "majority of residents? Based on what? What are the numbers? Besides, we already know not "all" businesses were consulted ergo not "all" residents were consulted. It's bureaucratic blather based on....? Who knows. My point, which surely isn't rocket science, is if the intent was to placate "all" those consulted given those "overwhelming margins" why is the access to Beadon not further restricted? Why is it just Beadon? What is that actual impact of that miniscule measure going to be? I'd suggest familiarizing yourself with the conditions on Glenthorne. In places it is two lanes, in others one but then again two given the bus lane time restrictions. That goes back to one lane on Sundays when single-yellow parking narrows it back to one. So you have a one-lane road giving way to the two-lanes on Beadon. Pointless. The pinch point remains on Glenthorne which negates the intent of the increased CPZ. "There are plenty of yellow lines all over London, and most don't have any adjacent time plates." We're talking about the precedent set by LBHF. Not to mention the reasonable expectation also created by LBHF given the multiple time plates on Glenthorne that LBHF staff then point you to. |