| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | |
| Posted by: | Peter Evans | |
| Date/Time: | 20/12/24 17:55:00 |
| I wonder what the bus drivers think, though even if they say it's taking them longer and they're missing their meal breaks, data will doubtless be produced to prove that such 'unreliable anecdotal evidence' can't be true. It's interesting how so much 'anecdotal evidence' from so many local residents about what a chaotic mess CHR has become, compared with the broad and spacious avenue it used to be, is so often met with counter-intuitive data to prove them wrong. There must be the subject for a thesis here somewhere. Having said that, I still chuckle at data that could interpret a vehicle passing a detection point every 15 seconds or so as 'smooth-flowing light traffic' when it was actually nose-to-tail and barely inching past the detector - one vehicle every fifteen seconds! |