| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Religious meetings at the Natural Cafe | |
| Posted by: | Julia Matcham | |
| Date/Time: | 30/05/07 14:22:00 |
| Alan and Roland, I can’t contend with rude and spiteful mis-representations of what I have said. It is ‘messianic’ and a ‘mantra’ if I write it, but , but of course rational argument if it is you two writing. Plus, you both make me a whipping boy for ideas that are no-way mine. What I say is described as 'ill-informed and prejudiced' but needless to say you are free from that. Here are some more: between the two of you, to quote but a few are: ‘rhetorical style/ provocative terminology/mouthing of platitudes/mangled sentence structure (you pompous twit)/ repetition of mistakes ever more forcefully and hysterically’. These are not ARGUMENTS, but they spice up everything you say with patronising insults. I have had enough. I could go on arguing with almost every sentence you write. Roland even talks about me censoring fairy stories…is he mad (yes I can be rude too)? …what reason would I have for that? In fact it is religious people who are touchy about fairy stories…for obvious reasons. By the way Richard Dawkins ‘The God Delusion’ is on sale for £4.50 at Waterstones. You should read it. I hasten to add that in my case he was preaching to the converted. Enough is enough. I will leave you to have the last word. |