Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Bishopsgate Supreme Court ruling | |
Posted by: | Mandy Waters | |
Date/Time: | 01/07/22 20:59:00 |
Weren't the discrimination claims rejected by the courts because councils claimed the schemes were temporary, and/or because councils in certain instances conferred with Cycling for the Disabled, which is hardly representative of many less able people who do not cycle. Not sure how that works when they then make them permanent. |