Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:3rd runway noise in Chiswick | |
Posted by: | Tim Henderson | |
Date/Time: | 09/02/08 17:20:00 |
I guess he means that the number of flights would have to go down to maintain the area under the 57dB Leq contour at 2002 levels if the third runway area was affected by noisier flights. On the other hand, if you put all the noisy ones on the middle runway and quiet ones on the outside ones, maybe you can have a lot of flights for the same area. Oh, is this why losing the Cranford Agreement might be attractive ? |