| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:For Richard | |
| Posted by: | Philip Walsh | |
| Date/Time: | 03/05/11 10:37:00 |
| Richard I saw nothing in that video that warranted a snatch squad by goons, the claim of being equipped for criminal damage seems unproven I saw no evidence of it or of the person being arrested in possession of anything. I could course damage with a key, even a coin or a pencil. There were at least six serious crime squad officers (average PCs and CID officers are not built like brick ****houses)around twenty uniformed officers then form a barricade to Kettle half a peaceful teenagers in soho square and this is ok with you! Where does freedom require such draconian repression, according to you not in a totalitarian state afraid of a popular uprising but in Britain. The bastion of freedom (including free speech) the home of political diversity where people are free to express their disagreements (or not as is now apparently the case) Britain where political satire was has been held in great esteem since at least the times of Shakespeare. Anyone would think there were no real crimes to solve, no real victims requiring justice. I presume the 2 dozen police officers called out the day before the wedding to deal with the deadly team of terrorists that was planning to explode a piece of street theatre on the crowds attending the wedding with all the horror and death this would almost definitely would of coursed (Yes I am being sarcastic) was also justified. put your blindfold on chap and keep walking, totalitarianism is just up there and to the right. As for people missing the wedding by 'accident' because they may have been at a hospital appointment. This crap was on every radio and tv Channing at some point in the day, the day is 24 hours long not 9-5 one would have to bee comatose all day to miss it accidentally!!!!!!!!!!!! Stewart the only reason you keep putting up comments about me having a spliff is because you are incapable of reasoned augment without making petty jibes that boost your misplaced sense of superiority, I suspect you and many others) may be a bit of a soak but I don't feel the need to call you one or make reference to you indulging in alcohol every time I respond to your postings because its not relevant. |