| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:For Stewart | |
| Posted by: | Stewart Dean | |
| Date/Time: | 03/05/11 07:35:00 |
| "you grassed me up a couple of years ago by publishing my website link here without my permission.." That just tells me how little you know about the internet. YOU published your website link when you put it live. You posted some massive clues on here about what you where up to. Publishing a video of yourself on the internet on something that could get your colour felt and saying it was you is a fairly dumb act. "you `research`people which is tantamount to stalking.." Again Bobby, not true. About 99% of what I know about you comes from one source - yourself, and then all from this forum. The rest is from what others have offered in passing conversation which I have not dug for and then there's nothing they've said I can think that you probably havn't mentioned but I wasn't paying attention. "you have also continually accused me of running trolls.. of not being a real person.." I know you're a real person, I've met you! What else. "you have also privately e mailed members of this Forum and then denied doing so when you were challenged on it.." I sent one email by mistake. It said, wait for it, "Test". If the person involved had said the message said 'Test' then I would have known what had happened. They insisted in posting full address and thought it was some kind of creepy attack. "when they publicly posted your message with your e mail address you failed to apologise and bleated about your e mail address being made public.." I said it was a mistake. That's all there is to it. I didn't even get a chance to say sorry before I had known what had happened. To be honest my email address is already public but it was the spirit the post was made in that made me have no desire to apologise to that person. What then happened was another individual then posted as me. That would have been one of a very small amount of people and you are not above suspicion on that one. After all have you not said that in your 'art' [sic] that you like to play with identity? I have only ever posted as myself despite being accused of posting as others. Can you say you have only ever posted under your name? I'll take your word for it if you say yes. "if i was Philip Walsh i would not be pleased about your comments on his `smoking`.." I said nothing about it in this thread. Go back and check. Wasn't me. I know nothing about Philip that he hasn't posted here. "as i was not pleased about your assertions that the police were `monitoring` me a couple of years ago.." That's a new one. I made no such assertions. I have never thought that the police where monitoring you, I don't think they had a reason to, why would I assert it? That makes less sense than the other fantasies. As for being Malicious - I've done nothing other than repeat information YOU have given to me. In the past others have accused you of being a bully, something I tend to agree to. Your constant barrage of name calling and personal attacks has been malicious. I am being totally honest here and I'll let others judge for themselves. |