| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re: brain surgery.. | |
| Posted by: | David Lesniak | |
| Date/Time: | 19/01/20 14:07:00 |
| As Cllr Lambert well knows, single-yellow parking along CHR on both sides will be removed by CS9. So the net loss of 5 spaces is a gross misrepresentation for anyone who may wish to visit the CHR after hours and on Sundays. Please, Cllr Lambert, calculate that loss and represent it openly and truthfully here on this forum. Whilst we wait for a cold day in hell, Cllr Lambert is partly responsible for the 9-storey car park on Brentford High Street. It would help businesses there if customers had access to the car park eventually. But better to let is sit there empty, unused, for the next three years or so. Is that right? So you can't even figure out a way to monetize parking in the interim for the good of the council and to the benefit of the remaining businesses in Brentford. And yet Labour has to raise council tax to meet a shortfall it refuses to divulge? Utterly, totally, brilliant. No wonder why Labour suffered the greatest loss in 85 years. Primarily? How many spaces are earmarked for business, Guy? Again, answer openly and truthfully. It will be a net gain for Brentford where you have just under represented a net loss for Chiswick. Word to Guy, customers have trouble finding parking in Chiswick. And the people of Chiswick have trouble believing any rhetoric that comes from Hounslow House as it slips and slides and never goes near the truth. Sorry, Guy, but a cross-party Parliamentary Report disagrees with you. And you contradict yourself with your words and actions within your own borough. As Iain Cassidy has said, just because a bike lane sits empty doesn't mean it isn't needed. Ditto parking. I think you're smart enough to know that. |