Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re::Front page article re. area planning committees
Posted by: Guy Lambert
Date/Time: 12/06/11 11:57:00

George says earlier in this thread:
"So far as office developments are concerned I think that Councils should be empowered to charge some kind of occupation tax while the buildings are empty so that the developer thinks much harder about the rents he will charge. Say for buildings over say 40,000 square feet. Oh dear I hear Adam say, do I realise how that will drive developers away because of the prospect of not making a profit."

There's a thread I started on the 'other' forum here: http://chiswickforums.co.uk/showthread.php?338-Does-anyone-understand-the-commercial-property-market which is concerned with the logic of buildings (in this case a good deal less than 40K sq. ft) built and remaining empty for years. Despite Ralph's responses to this thread I am still baffled.

I have not read every word of this thread but it is interesting - and to be applauded - that Sam Hearn has resisted the temptation to make cheap political points here in favour of a rational argument (though it seems he and John Todd may have different views).

I don't have a strong position about local area committees but Sam's points seem to make sense. And I'm very aware of the power of nimbyism and in particular the ability of certain vocal minorities to use localism to sway decisions in favour of their sectional interest even where wider local opinion, let alone the interests of the wider community, may be different.

I would also observe, having recently moved from Chiswick to Brentford, that Brentford continues to be blighted by large swathes of empty - mainly commercial - property and vacant sites, many in potentially very desirable riverside locations. We are desparately short of housing in London and the commercial developers are having great difficulty justifying residential development, whilst the economy bumbles along the bottom. Is this not an excellent moment for public investment: if we could replicate the Brentford Dock estate, built as I recall by the GLC, this would provide huge benefits.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 13:51:00 Adam Beamish
   Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 14:32:00 Sam Hearn Cllr
      Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 15:31:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 16:12:00 Phil Andrews
         Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 16:15:00 Monica Devlin
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 16:28:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 17:04:00 Phil Andrews
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 17:06:00 Adam Beamish
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 17:41:00 Sam Hearn Cllr
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 18:02:00 George Knox
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 19:30:00 Adam Beamish
   Re:Front page article re. area planning committees03/06/11 20:19:00 Elizabeth Ross
      Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees04/06/11 02:02:00 Phil Andrews
         Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees04/06/11 08:40:00 Francis Rowe
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees04/06/11 12:22:00 Phil Andrews
               Front page article re. area planning committees04/06/11 14:02:00 George Knox
            Area Planning committees terminated04/06/11 18:50:00 John Todd
               Re:Area Planning committees terminated05/06/11 01:14:00 Phil Andrews
               Re:Area Planning committees terminated06/06/11 10:31:00 Francis Rowe
                  Re:Re:Area Planning committees terminated06/06/11 11:02:00 Phil Andrews
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees09/06/11 15:24:00 Adam Beamish
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees09/06/11 15:53:00 Phil Andrews
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees09/06/11 16:03:00 Adam Beamish
   Re:Front page article re. area planning committees05/06/11 15:41:00 Sarah Bradley
      Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees05/06/11 16:27:00 Elizabeth Ross
      Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees05/06/11 18:27:00 George Knox
         Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees06/06/11 12:04:00 Sam Hearn Cllr
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees06/06/11 12:27:00 Elizabeth Ross
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees06/06/11 13:07:00 Phil Andrews
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees06/06/11 14:23:00 Elizabeth Ross
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees06/06/11 12:55:00 Phil Andrews
               Abolition of Chiswick Area Planning Committee is bad news for Chiswick06/06/11 18:26:00 David Giles
                  Re:Abolition of Chiswick Area Planning Committee is bad news for Chiswick06/06/11 20:23:00 Phil Andrews
                     Re:Re:Abolition of Chiswick Area Planning Committee is bad news for Chiswick06/06/11 23:50:00 George Knox
                        Re:Re:Re:Abolition of Chiswick Area Planning Committee is bad news for Chiswick07/06/11 10:40:00 Sam Hearn Cllr
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Abolition of Chiswick Area Planning Committee is bad news for Chiswick07/06/11 11:02:00 Phil Andrews
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Abolition of Chiswick Area Planning Committee is bad news for Chiswick07/06/11 17:18:00 David Giles
      Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees09/06/11 15:37:00 Adam Beamish
         Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees09/06/11 17:08:00 David Giles
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees09/06/11 21:41:00 Adam Beamish
               :Front page article re. area planning committees10/06/11 10:40:00 David McLoughlin
                  Re::Front page article re. area planning committees10/06/11 11:08:00 Phil Andrews
                  Re::Front page article re. area planning committees10/06/11 12:11:00 Adam Beamish
                     Re:Re::Front page article re. area planning committees12/06/11 10:38:00 David McLoughlin
                        Re:Re:Re::Front page article re. area planning committees12/06/11 11:57:00 Guy Lambert
                           Front page article re. area planning committees12/06/11 14:45:00 George Knox
                              Re:Front page article re. area planning committees12/06/11 15:06:00 Guy Lambert
                                 Re:Re:Front page article re. area planning committees12/06/11 15:37:00 George Knox
                                 Facts12/06/11 16:32:00 John Todd
                                    Re:Facts12/06/11 18:17:00 Elizabeth Ross
                                       Re:Re:Facts12/06/11 19:32:00 Phil Andrews
                                          Re:Re:Re:Facts12/06/11 21:16:00 Adam Beamish
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Facts12/06/11 22:33:00 Phil Andrews
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Facts13/06/11 12:22:00 Adam Beamish
                                                   Opinions13/06/11 12:49:00 Richard Greenhough

Forum Home