| Aside from the snarky bits about paint-ball guns and dogs, I actually think Ken may be on to something. For no reason, I started wondering about one-way traffic on CHR. West bound only. The surrounding roads (A4, Bath, Uxbridge) could pick up the east bound traffic. Or, as Ken said, perhaps timing is the key so one way at one time of day and reverse that at another time of day. I was thinking less road, more pavement (or sidewalks some would say). Fill the wider pavement with public tables and benches and gardens, upgrade street lights to conservation-grade fixtures which have finally been installed at the intersection of Chiswick Lane, maintain allowable seating areas for cafes and install better designed bike racks suitable for a Conservation Area, not the mish mash of what exists. For my money I'd remove some bus stops to get people to walk further to the next stop - controversial I know, but if it's about a healthier lifestyle for all, then perhaps walk a little more before hopping on the bus. And revise some routes. Getting stuck behind three E3 buses which are bumper to bumper always makes me laugh at how inefficient it is. Make the entire exercise one of careful, considered urban design, of place making which, sadly, the current scheme does not do. And I appreciate Ken's nod to necessary parking. The need for it won't suddenly disappear despite wishing it so. With an improved town centre, it would keep Chiswick the destination it is for many who come to shop and eat from further afield and with an actual parking amenity it would mean those folks who need or want to drive are able to. When modeling any solution, TfL must be looking at all types of ideas no matter how crazy or radical. They have not demonstrated that to date and they miss an opportunity for an improved city. They owe all Londoners better discipline when doing their research. |