Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Proscription of Palestine Action | |
Posted by: | Julian Pavey | |
Date/Time: | 09/07/25 00:35:00 |
OK No person wants to answer my question for the second time of asking. Clearly, one person is skirting around the issue and the laws. And not what a handful make known within the UN as an agenda, by a handful at best. Palestinian activists sprayed paint into the engines of two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton as a protest against the UK's support for Israel's war on Gaza. Within hours posted as action taken under the name of "Palestine Action" So the crucial part within that is the purpose to protest or influence the UK government. That part was the obvious answer to my question That makes it an act of terrorism and not vandalism or whatever you may wish to call it, and to do it under the banner of Palestine Action makes that group a terrorist group. As a military base and the target to change or influence or send a direct message to the UK government makes it an act of terrorism. Nothing more, nothing less It's straight and simple |