| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:March for EU | |
| Posted by: | Brian Coyle | |
| Date/Time: | 09/09/17 13:41:00 |
| First of all, what exactly is this 'madness' that the OP refers to? Historically, most marches per se, achieve absolutely nothing, unless those marching can prove that there is some merit in what they are doing. This would involve some follow-up action to be taken, in order to convince the public and any relevant organisation, that their points have some validity and are worth being taken seriously. Marching in itself does not do this. What did last year's March for Europe achieve, and what was their follow-up action?? |