Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?
Posted by: Jeff Gear
Date/Time: 10/01/05 20:38:00

Jonathan - "And in the future fusion power still beckons - twenty, thirty years away? - Is that too long to wait?"

Well, perhaps yes.  Theroux's thrust was that drastic reduction of carbon emissions was now so urgent that we had to take a chance on sensible solutions to nuclear waste disposal being developed.  The only way to decimate carbon emissions was to switch to nuclear power, which, given the will to do so, could be achieved in a decade.

In part, the program interested me so much through the coincidence that I watched it in the company of an old friend visiting from Japan.  He's a UK scientist who has worked on the development of fusion power for 30 years, and currently part of the international project in Japan.  Unfortunately I get the impression that significant power generation from fusion reactors is still more than 30 years away.  On the positive side it seems that fusion reactors - themselves clean - could be used to break down  other radioactive waste as a sideline operation...
Jeff


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
DoW: Should we go nuclear?09/01/05 19:26:00 Jeff Gear
   Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?09/01/05 23:56:00 Richard Jennings
      Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?10/01/05 01:29:00 Peter John
         Market forces?10/01/05 17:46:00 Jeff Gear
   Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?10/01/05 04:09:00 Jim Lawes
      Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?10/01/05 13:26:00 Stewart Dean
         It's very simple:10/01/05 14:34:00 Colin Murphy
            Re:It's very simple:10/01/05 15:22:00 Stewart Dean
   I agree.10/01/05 10:04:00 Colin Murphy
      Let's mix it10/01/05 11:17:00 Malcolm Peltu
         Re:Let's mix it10/01/05 13:33:00 Jono Miller
   Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?10/01/05 18:14:00 Jonathan Bingham
      Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?10/01/05 19:22:00 David Fox
      Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?10/01/05 20:38:00 Jeff Gear
         Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?10/01/05 21:42:00 Jonathan Bingham
            Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?11/01/05 09:22:00 Jeff Gear
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?11/01/05 10:07:00 Jonathan Bingham
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?11/01/05 15:16:00 Jeff Gear
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?11/01/05 15:30:00 Asha Winterflood
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?11/01/05 17:33:00 Jonathan Bingham
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?12/01/05 22:35:00 Dominic Corp
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?15/01/05 18:23:00 David Fox
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?17/01/05 09:15:00 Dominic Corp
   Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?16/01/05 16:39:00 Jeff Gear
      Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?16/01/05 18:46:00 Peter John
         Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?17/01/05 09:51:00 Jeff Gear
            Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?17/01/05 10:03:00 Colin Murphy
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?17/01/05 13:22:00 Jim Lawes
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?17/01/05 13:38:00 Asha Winterflood
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:DoW: Should we go nuclear?18/01/05 14:25:00 Jim Lawes

Forum Home