Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’
Posted by: Jeremy Parkinson
Date/Time: 24/07/26 11:32:00

This would have been a good idea but, as I said earlier, it is pointless coming up with wheezes for what do do about the bridge when this has already been decided some time ago.

You can take issue with the requirements of listing status but all the agencies involved seem to have accepted quite early on that the bridge would be restored.

This has meant that it is really a heritage project rather than a transport project and much of the massive cost is not related to strengthening the bridge but a like for like replacement of each part of the structure with materials that are difficult to replicate and have to be sourced from specialists.

The amount of money that needs to be spent to keep the bridge open to all users is relatively small but it looks like the statutory imperative to maintain a heritage asset is more powerful than that to ensure that the bridge can be crossed.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 09:36:00 Jeremy Parkinson
   Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 09:46:00 Philippa Bond
      Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 11:05:00 Chris Dakers
         Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 11:20:00 Richard Greenhough
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 13:14:00 Michael Robinson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 13:29:00 Richard Greenhough
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 15:55:00 Michael Robinson
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 17:08:00 Jeremy Parkinson
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’23/07/26 19:49:00 Adrian Irving
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 08:45:00 Lucy Chambers
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 11:32:00 Jeremy Parkinson
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 11:58:00 Adrian Irving
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 12:00:00 Paul James
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 12:35:00 David Lesniak
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 13:42:00 Adrian Irving
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 14:11:00 Jeremy Parkinson
                                          Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 14:46:00 Michael Robinson
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 15:59:00 Adrian Irving
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 16:19:00 Andrew Jones
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 16:38:00 Jeremy Parkinson
                                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’24/07/26 17:21:00 Adrian Irving

Forum Home