Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Reply
Posted by: Mark Evans
Date/Time: 08/07/22 17:59:00

It's definitely worth looking at but it will be a difficult challenge. Redirecting traffic from Dukes Avenue to SCR isn't necessarily a win in terms of improving the environment where people live as there are far more residents on the latter. ANPR enforced residents' access may not be viable so close to a commercial centre and TfL may not be keen to put more pressure on the problem SCR/A4 junction.

I fully understand your point about casualties as a percentage of road use type. I think at this stage all we can say is that there is no clear picture as to whether the cycleway has reduced collisions but there is no argument that it has made the area much more dangerous. What it very evidently has done is increased the perception of safety in central Chiswick as there are far more families using this bit.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Cycleway9 Open at Hammersmith Gyratory30/06/22 20:05:00 Paul Campbell
   Re:Cycleway9 Open at Hammersmith Gyratory01/07/22 12:53:00 David Lesniak
      Re:Re:Cycleway9 Open at Hammersmith Gyratory01/07/22 18:05:00 Andrew Jones
         Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 Open at Hammersmith Gyratory01/07/22 21:32:00 Adrian Irving
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 Open at Hammersmith Gyratory01/07/22 23:01:00 Maggie Dodge
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 Open at Hammersmith Gyratory02/07/22 18:00:00 Philippa Bond
            Reply03/07/22 00:08:00 Michael Preece
               Re:Reply03/07/22 00:21:00 Ed Saper
                  Re:Re:Reply03/07/22 07:32:00 Philippa Bond
                  Re:Re:Reply03/07/22 08:51:00 Paul Campbell
                  Re:Re:Reply03/07/22 14:19:00 Michael Adams
         Reply02/07/22 11:27:00 David Lesniak
            Re:Reply02/07/22 12:02:00 Andrew Jones
               Re:Re:Reply02/07/22 12:20:00 Edward Seaton
                  Re:Re:Re:Reply02/07/22 15:23:00 Francis Sheehan
                     Reply03/07/22 08:49:00 Paul Campbell
                        Re:Reply03/07/22 12:15:00 Francis Sheehan
               Re:Re:Reply03/07/22 07:26:00 David Lesniak
                  Re:Re:Re:Reply03/07/22 14:44:00 Andrew Jones
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 08:19:00 David Lesniak
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 08:28:00 Mark Evans
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 08:38:00 Maggie Dodge
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 08:49:00 Mark Evans
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 11:37:00 Maggie Dodge
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 09:32:00 Tom Pike
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 11:08:00 Michael Robinson
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 12:21:00 Mark Evans
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 12:51:00 Michael Robinson
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 12:32:00 Al Webber
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 13:00:00 Michael Robinson
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 13:21:00 Tom Pike
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/07/22 13:38:00 Mark Evans
   Cycleway 9 is fully open08/07/22 14:15:00 Paul Campbell
      Re:Cycleway 9 is fully open but is it worth all the money and aggravations08/07/22 14:26:00 Maggie Dodge
         Re:Re:Cycleway 9 is fully open but is it worth all the money and aggravations08/07/22 14:32:00 Babs Doodkorte
            Re:Re:Re:Cycleway 9 is fully open but is it worth all the money and aggravations08/07/22 14:53:00 Justin Stephenson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway 9 is fully open but is it worth all the money and aggravations08/07/22 15:04:00 Francis Sheehan
                  Reply08/07/22 16:02:00 Michael Robinson
                     Re:Reply08/07/22 16:20:00 Mark Evans
                        Re:Re:Reply08/07/22 16:46:00 Michael Robinson
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply08/07/22 17:59:00 Mark Evans
                     Re:Reply09/07/22 18:33:00 Justin Stephenson
                        Re:Re:Reply09/07/22 18:58:00 Michael Robinson
                           Re:Re:Re:Reply09/07/22 19:43:00 Paul Campbell
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply11/07/22 21:33:00 Justin Stephenson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway 9 is fully open but is it worth all the money and aggravations08/07/22 15:05:00 Janice Evans
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway 9 is fully open but is it worth all the money and aggravations08/07/22 19:08:00 Maggie Dodge
                     Re: money and aggravations08/07/22 19:15:00 Russell Pearson
   The new section08/07/22 20:23:00 Paul Campbell
      Re:The new sectioned08/07/22 20:38:00 Russell Pearson
         Re:Re:The new sectioned08/07/22 21:16:00 Paul Campbell
         Re:Re:The new sectioned08/07/22 22:33:00 Maggie Dodge
            Re:Re:Re:The new sectioned08/07/22 23:08:00 Paul Campbell
               Re:Re:Re:Re:The new sectioned09/07/22 20:00:00 Russell Pearson
      Re:The new section09/07/22 00:02:00 Michael Preece
         Re:Re still not right09/07/22 07:29:00 Maggie Dodge
      Re:The new section09/07/22 07:51:00 David Lesniak
         Re:Re:The new section09/07/22 08:50:00 Vivienne Cox
            Re:Re:Re:The new section09/07/22 09:51:00 Maggie Dodge
               Re:Re:Re:Re:The new section09/07/22 10:50:00 Vivienne Cox
   Re:Cycleway9 Open at Hammersmith Gyratory09/07/22 11:59:00 Tony Mansell
      Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 09/07/22 12:46:00 Maggie Dodge
         Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 09/07/22 13:11:00 Francis Rowe
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 worth it ? 09/07/22 14:47:00 Maggie Dodge
         Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 11/07/22 16:51:00 Tony Mansell
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 11/07/22 18:48:00 Maggie Dodge
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 05:41:00 David Lesniak
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 06:25:00 Maggie Dodge
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 10:52:00 Adrian Irving
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 11:06:00 Francis Sheehan
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 11:34:00 Mandy Waters
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 12:22:00 Michael Robinson
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 12:28:00 Francis Sheehan
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cycleway9 dangerous for all 12/07/22 13:02:00 Michael Robinson

Forum Home