Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?
Posted by: Richard Jennings
Date/Time: 15/09/14 00:52:00

"In a UK context my simple belief is that being Mayor of London or MP is a full time job and trying to twin is not correct or acceptable."

But MPs continue to represent their constituencies when they get appointed as ministers.  If George Osborne can be Chancellor of the Exchequer as well as MP for Tatton, why can't Boris be Mayor of London and MP for Uxbridge?


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Boris is for turning?13/09/14 21:37:00 Joe Conneely
   Re:Boris is for turning?13/09/14 22:14:00 bobby osborne
   Re:Boris is for turning?13/09/14 22:40:00 Thomas Barry
      Re:Re:Boris is for turning?14/09/14 10:04:00 David Giles
   Re:Boris is for turning?14/09/14 10:07:00 Richard Greenhough
      Re:Re:Boris is for turning?14/09/14 16:56:00 Joe Conneely
         Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?14/09/14 20:59:00 Richard Greenhough
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?14/09/14 21:21:00 Joe Conneely
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 00:52:00 Richard Jennings
   Re:Boris is for turning?14/09/14 22:10:00 Guy Lambert
      Re:Re:Boris is for turning?14/09/14 23:28:00 David Roberts
         Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 11:20:00 Susan Kelly
      Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 09:04:00 Vanessa Smith
         Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 14:23:00 Vanessa Smith
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 14:39:00 Richard Greenhough
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 14:46:00 Julian Pavey
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 15:13:00 Vanessa Smith
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning?15/09/14 15:36:00 Richard Greenhough

Forum Home