| Topic: | Re:Boris is for turning? | |
| Posted by: | Thomas Barry | |
| Date/Time: | 13/09/14 22:40:00 |
| "do none of these people understand the concept of showing independence and avoiding potential conflicts of interest?" This is a man who tried to argue that it was OK to lie to his party leader about an affair because Bill Clinton had lied about his affair. I'm not entirely sure one should expect to much honesty and principle from that direction, really. Still, Mary Macleod likes him, even though he blatantly mislead her about the Turnham Green Piccadilly Line stop. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Boris is for turning? | 13/09/14 21:37:00 | Joe Conneely |
| Re:Boris is for turning? | 13/09/14 22:14:00 | bobby osborne |
| Re:Boris is for turning? | 13/09/14 22:40:00 | Thomas Barry |
| Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 14/09/14 10:04:00 | David Giles |
| Re:Boris is for turning? | 14/09/14 10:07:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 14/09/14 16:56:00 | Joe Conneely |
| Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 14/09/14 20:59:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 14/09/14 21:21:00 | Joe Conneely |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 00:52:00 | Richard Jennings |
| Re:Boris is for turning? | 14/09/14 22:10:00 | Guy Lambert |
| Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 14/09/14 23:28:00 | David Roberts |
| Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 11:20:00 | Susan Kelly |
| Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 09:04:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 14:23:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 14:39:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 14:46:00 | Julian Pavey |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 15:13:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Boris is for turning? | 15/09/14 15:36:00 | Richard Greenhough |