| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Damp squibs | |
| Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
| Date/Time: | 20/10/14 16:31:00 |
| George, I’ve fully explained what I meant when I referred to the term ‘usual’, and explained a long way back in this thread that I think the claims may well be true, but I’ve said they are of little interest to me, and I’ve explained why. Of course, if was on a jury, I would look thoroughly at the evidence to help ensure that the correct judgement was reached. It’s interesting (for the want of a better word) that you make all these claims against me for bringing quite firm evidence to peoples attention, yet say little (nothing actually) about the lies the authorities told to lead the public into believing that the accused were at the locations in question at the time stated. These claims relied on two small pieces of information: 1) That the accused were spotted at King’s Cross Station on Monday 11th July and traced back to Luton Station on Tuesday 12th July where 2) they were found to have boarded the 07.40am train. Both of these claims have been proven to be untrue. When we add this information to all of the other information we have on the case, there is no evidence for any rational thinking person to conclude that the accused were guilty of this crime; and neither you, or anyone else, has pointed towards any credible evidence to suggest otherwise. It doesn’t matter to me whether you trust me or not. Having read your posts on this subject, maybe I don’t trust you. |