George, I know of people that have written to every MP in the land about this. On a local basis, we know that Chiswick is very media orientated, and that some of the presenters/producers/researchers will likely have seen the evidence, which doesn’t support the official story; and what have they done? We live in a government/media controlled society; and the role of the media is part of my point. Not only does the evidence suggest government involvement in many alleged terrorist acts, but the media, who many people trust, help cover it up. Even on the radio, people are just laughed off on stations like LBC when it’s suggested by a caller that there may have been government involvement in certain terrorist acts.
Anyone that has control of legislation, the police, security forces etc. to enable the exercising of an operation like 7/7, and then has the media at their disposal to put out a false story and shut off any small voices that challenge it, have pretty much got it all made, even if the evidence shows the story to be a complete pack of lies, as appears to be the case with 7/7. Therefore, those of us that care about such things can only do things in a very limited capacity but, nonetheless, whilst you accuse me of not doing enough, I suspect that I have made a fair number of people aware of evidence that wouldn’t have known otherwise, and some of these people are likely to be people of influence. As we know, we’re all being watched, so with me having posted so much information about alleged terrorist acts, I’m sure they’ll be keeping a close eye on me; and I think they’ll be less keen to pull off such stunts in the future if they know that people are aware of how they operate. And what I don’t have to do, is read threads on this forum about alleged terrorism, and not comment on what the evidence has amounted to in the past in respect of alleged terrorism claims.
|