Topic: | Re:Damp squibs | |
Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
Date/Time: | 20/10/14 11:34:00 |
Richard, I see that you’re still trying to belittle the relevance of terror drill exercises being carried out by crisis management company, Visor Consultants, relating to the exact same train locations and consisting of the exact same scenario as what actually happened, prompting Peter Power and his team to change procedures from “slow time to quick time thinking.” In fact, on the day of 7/7, Peter Power stated that their ‘rehearsals’ assumed ‘simultaneous’ explosions when, at that time, it was being reported that the bombs had gone off over a period of time, so they even, miraculously, guessed that bit right; and all as assumed a year prior on Panorama, which Peter Power also featured in. The reference made to the controlled demolition van ‘that happened to be next to the bombed bus’, is not a fantasy, but reference to a fact. Murder is a serious crime, and investigations can take a long time, yet on the day of the bombings, Tony Blair addressed the nation and blamed Islam, when the occupants of a controlled demolition van parked alongside a bombed bus were not even suspects. Is this how you would run an investigation? You portray yourself as being a person with great attention to detail, yet in respect of events such as 7/7, you make very little comment on the evidence or the lies told by the authorities (the detail), making it very clear that you have an agenda, with the truth being of little importance. Q6: At around 10.30am on the morning of 7/7, at least 2 ‘terrorists’ were reported by various news outlets, including Radio 5, as being shot dead at Canary Wharf. This must surely have happened or these reports (which were never repeated) would not have come in. Who were these men most likely to have been? |