| Topic: | Re:Re:Wall Street's Pentagon Papers: Biggest Financial Scam In World History | |
| Posted by: | Stewart Dean | |
| Date/Time: | 15/12/10 13:15:00 |
| Any content was hidden beneath an unreadable delivery. The quality of a source of information is more important than if the message is one you agree with. I read this and find it overly biased to the point where I'm unable to know if there this is usable information. With so many opinions floating around and so many figures there is a danger that people get carried away by myths and incorrect numbers. I'm a big believer in the scientific method and formal debating and find opinion pieces have to be written as such and not pretend to be a statement of fact, Charlie Brooker being a great example of someone who can get that balance right and, to be balanced, Mr Clarkson also does much the same from an alternative point of view. It's opinion, not factual content. So in summary what could have been interesting is over ruled by how it was written and puts it into the non credible camp for me, along side the Glen Becks of this world. This is quite a good example of why deliver has to be balanced and well constructed for it to be effective. |