| Topic: | Re:Re:Starmergeddon | |
| Posted by: | Anthony Hawran | |
| Date/Time: | 15/07/24 22:11:00 |
| Andrew Jones and John Hall, all this shows is that Sir Starmer with the Lego hair has been a detached "armchair general" with an authoritarian mindset. He would rather have protected the inbred state with its establishment against the "little people", in the Post Office cases, and turn a blind eye to the Jimmy Saville case. Sir Starmer with the Lego hair is a grey inbred "state knows best" with a Soviet authoritarian mindset administrator. I do not think he is a really critical thinker. He just wants power, and will virtue signal his way to it, along with the Labour Party. (04/07/24 20:14:00 Anthony Hawran) Anthony, Keir Starmer had as much to do with allowing the Post Office to run riot as the former government (possibly less so if truth be told) - the CPS WASN’T involved with the prosecutions that the Post Office undertook. The Government had the power to intervene as the shareholder with the most clout, but they always insisted that the Post Office be allowed to operate at arms length and didn’t intervene. It’s a scandal, but you are totally barking up wrong tree in holding Starmer responsible.(04/07/24 22:26:00 Andrew Jones) Andrew, Sir Starmer with the Lego hair, as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was involved in the prosecution of sub-postmasters. He was part of the justice system, and it massively failed the sub-postmasters. Postmasters prosecuted by CPS while Keir Starmer was in charge (www.independent.co.uk, Wednesday 10 January 2024 18:59 GMT) Why did Sir Starmer with the Lego hair not exercise any diligence in questioning the irregularly large number of prosecutions, by the Post Office? Why did he allow the CPS to act on behalf of the Post Office in some cases? |