Forum Message

Posted by: Colin Clark
Date/Time: 16/09/15 04:06:00

Is it correct that a written header of "without prejudice" in your reply letter to their allegation letter, helpful to your case should you wish to change your statements therein later?
It is useful to the plaintiff but can it give the defendant any protection in county court?
I doubt it but hey, Euro are misrepresenters.
Not replying seems an effective tactic.
A search of that header gives "without detriment to any existing right or claim". Thanks for any replies.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Euro car parks charge..help15/09/15 18:10:00 Lucy Hacking
   Re:Euro car parks charge..help15/09/15 23:32:00 Nick Jenkins
   Re Euro car -WITHOUT PREJUDICE16/09/15 04:06:00 Colin Clark
   Re:Euro car parks charge..help16/09/15 12:25:00 Andrew Jones
      Re:Re:Euro car parks charge..help16/09/15 16:24:00 Nick Jenkins
   Re:Euro car parks charge..help16/09/15 16:38:00 Dave Robertson
      Re:Re:Euro car parks charge..help16/09/15 20:24:00 Lucy Hacking
         Re:Re:Re:Euro car parks charge..help17/09/15 07:40:00 Paul Corcoran
   Re:Euro car parks charge..help18/09/15 05:17:00 Lynn Clark

Forum Home