| Topic: | Re Euro car -WITHOUT PREJUDICE | |
| Posted by: | Colin Clark | |
| Date/Time: | 16/09/15 04:06:00 |
| Is it correct that a written header of "without prejudice" in your reply letter to their allegation letter, helpful to your case should you wish to change your statements therein later? It is useful to the plaintiff but can it give the defendant any protection in county court? I doubt it but hey, Euro are misrepresenters. Not replying seems an effective tactic. A search of that header gives "without detriment to any existing right or claim". Thanks for any replies. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Euro car parks charge..help | 15/09/15 18:10:00 | Lucy Hacking |
| Re:Euro car parks charge..help | 15/09/15 23:32:00 | Nick Jenkins |
| Re Euro car -WITHOUT PREJUDICE | 16/09/15 04:06:00 | Colin Clark |
| Re:Euro car parks charge..help | 16/09/15 12:25:00 | Andrew Jones |
| Re:Re:Euro car parks charge..help | 16/09/15 16:24:00 | Nick Jenkins |
| Re:Euro car parks charge..help | 16/09/15 16:38:00 | Dave Robertson |
| Re:Re:Euro car parks charge..help | 16/09/15 20:24:00 | Lucy Hacking |
| Re:Re:Re:Euro car parks charge..help | 17/09/15 07:40:00 | Paul Corcoran |
| Re:Euro car parks charge..help | 18/09/15 05:17:00 | Lynn Clark |