Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Ombudsman | |
Posted by: | Dan Murphy | |
Date/Time: | 08/10/14 14:43:00 |
David Oh yeah, right. Now I am a conspiracy theorist. Let's take a vote on who is the conspiracy theorist and who is the selfish, pompous idiot. You seem to have missed the point that I have seen over 100 pages of emails, between early 2011 and late 2012, between Cllr Mayne, the Chiswick House Trustees, and his band of "Old Family Friends" from Park Road. These emails tell the most dismal, slimy, self interested tale of how a small group of people can get exactly what they want provided that they know the right person. And I have to say that once again you need to be corrected on two key points. I really can't figure out whether you are so totally selfish that you really can't see it, or you are so totally stupid that you really don't understand it. 1. the 2-road CPZ was never in the slightest bit connected with "London Transport Strategy". Stop trying to bullshit us. It was about a small group of selfish and very well connected individuals who were able to get what they wanted despite 94% of their neighbours not wanting it. And not caring in the slightest about the chaos it would cause. So stop crapping on about how it's all down to London Transport Strategy - it's not, and nobody believes you for a single second. 2. The "Affected Streets" are every street in Grove Park. We have always known that, LBH always knew it before they shamefully removed the policy from their website, and we are now seeing the truth of that. I can only conclude that you lack the intellectual capacity to understand this simple point. Anyway, I am sick and tired of your pompous and self righteous opinions. Anyone who reads my post at the start of this thread can quickly work out for themselves exactly what went on here. And your increasingly pathetic claims that it's all part of some "greater strategy for London" sound as stupid as you do. And you still never answered my last question to you. Are you the same David Chivers that got thrown out of a council meeting because of your aggressive, abusive, bullying and completely intolerable behavior? Was that you? It would explain an awful lot. But it would indicate that you are in good company. |