Forum Message

Topic: :Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans
Posted by: John Todd
Date/Time: 25/11/10 15:39:00

Adam,

I disagree.

Wider circulation and or consultation would have been most beneficial-for both sides and for numerous reasons.

At the Chiswick Area Committee (CAC)meeting the presenting Planning Officer had to make additional enquiries pre the meeeting and speak to the result regarding the proposed client group. This detail was not in the published report.

I note that since the CAC SBHA and their architect have considered some alterations. Much more is required including a detailed Impact Statement

John



Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 14:01:00 Jane Hanna
   Re:Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 14:34:00 Adam Beamish
      :Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 15:39:00 John Todd
         Re::Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 15:52:00 Adam Beamish
            Re:Re::Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 15:56:00 Jane Hanna
               Re:Re:Re::Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 18:19:00 Colin Jordan
                  Re:Re:Re:Re::Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 19:44:00 Jennifer Selig
                  Re:Re:Re:Re::Shepherds Bush Housing Group Defend St Margaret's House Plans25/11/10 20:06:00 Adam Beamish
                     The Planning Process26/11/10 08:37:00 John Todd
                        Re:The Planning Process26/11/10 09:41:00 Adam Beamish
                           Re:Re:The Planning Process26/11/10 10:57:00 Colin Jordan
                              Re:Re:Re:The Planning Process27/11/10 07:30:00 Paul Corcoran

Forum Home