| Topic: | Sam Hearn | |
| Posted by: | Tom Pike | |
| Date/Time: | 04/09/19 19:48:00 |
| Hi Sam, You wrote: "The ONLY reason (as was confirmed last night) that a two way segregated cycle way is being considered at all is that it would be impossible to push a single lane cycle route along the north-side of CHR - too many pedestrians and too many mature trees. So because we cannot have a gold standard cycle scheme we must except a low quality substitute - this is outrageous." So are you now saying that "gold-standard" segregated cycling lanes on BOTH sides of the High Road is the way forward. You seem to have adopted a more radical pro-bike position than anybody else, and pedestrians and trees just need to get out of the way! From accounts of the council meet last night, the opposition to CW9 had a set of very confused and contradictory positions. Your posting similarly seems to be similarly self-conflicted. |