| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | |
| Posted by: | Diane Bardon | |
| Date/Time: | 11/04/19 13:40:00 |
| Nick I did the appeal by email but the adjudicator wrote “I am not persuaded that the suspension signage was indeed inadequate. I am satisfied that the Local Authority has met the grounds of adequacy and has adduced evidence to meet and challenge the points raised by the appellant. I am satisfied that the relevant sign was clear, prominent and unambiguous” Although I did provide evidence to proof the lower sign was turned to the pavement when I parked at the bay he choice to relay on the photo which was provided by parking services which was taken by the warden after he turned the bottom sign back to the road . Spot on why have two suspensions sign ? ....why not have the suspension date print it on all the faces of the triangle? if they going to use moveable temporary signature they can be turned around . |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 11:47:00 | Diane Bardon |
| Re:Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 11:54:00 | Janice Evans |
| Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 12:40:00 | Diane Bardon |
| Re:Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 13:13:00 | Elizabeth Jane Daley |
| Re:Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 15:26:00 | Janice Evans |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 17:11:00 | Richard Jennings |
| Re:Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 20:58:00 | Robin Cox |
| Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 10/04/19 22:50:00 | Diane Bardon |
| Re:Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 11/04/19 03:44:00 | Tony Smart |
| Re:Misleading suspension sign | 11/04/19 09:37:00 | Diane Bardon |
| Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 11/04/19 12:52:00 | Nick Jenkins |
| Re:Re:Re:Misleading suspension sign | 11/04/19 13:40:00 | Diane Bardon |