| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Holograms - a technical query | |
| Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
| Date/Time: | 01/12/13 22:25:00 |
| Also, I have seen enough evidence regarding the other events of that day to be sure that 9/11 was an inside job; and those buildings could not possibly have collapsed as a result of the heat caused by aviation fuel – it exploded upon impact, remember?! Plus the fuel cannot attain the required temperture to turn the columns into molten steel, which is what happened, and were still smouldering 3 months later. Witnesses heard explosions in the basement approx. 10 secs before each of the buildings collapsed, at which point smoke is seen to pour out of the basement (at least one of the towers). Seismic readings were measured as being 2.1 and 2.3, which are believed to be the result of these explosions, and not the collapsing buildings, which fell as dust. All that most people know about 9/11 is what they saw on the TV and what they were told at the time, me included until recently; but the facts, for those whom can be bothered to look them up, tell a very different story. The Pentagon is the biggest giveaway, but Shanksville, Pennsylvania is also a joke; and then there’s all the ridiculous peripheral stuff – planes proven to have never taken off, phone calls that couldn’t possibly have been made etc; and what about Building 7? No plane hit that, but even that collapsed, which it was always going to; and the explosives could not have been placed that same day. There is no evidence or reason to believe that anything the authorities told us is true. The whole thing is farcical. Here’s a funny story! (below) http://www.sott.net/article/266268-UK-man-wins-court-case-against-BBC-for-911-cover-up |