| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Holograms - a technical query | |
| Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
| Date/Time: | 01/12/13 21:28:00 |
| Janine, regarding 9/11, I did state that the hologram theory, is just that, a theory because the US military holographic science is unknown (to me, anyway); and the theory is the result of work carried out by Richard D. Hall. He had previously put forward a different theory, which he later disproved himself, so he looked for new possibilities. So why is he looking for theories other than those stated in the official story? The plane is said to have been travelling at 580mph, which aviation experts claim to be well outside of the plane’s capacity at that height; and a fragile aluminium plane can simply not pass through a steel columned building with reinforced concrete floors and clad in steel without the plane incurring any damage at the point of impact; or the building, for that matter, not to mention the other anomalies. So I am always interested to learn of anyone’s ideas about what may have happened and, whilst I don’t know much about holograms, it is this lack of knowledge which still makes this theory a possibility in my mind. “Maybe a cruise missile with a hologram around it? Couldn't just be empty air.” I wouldn’t know if it couldn’t just be empty air, but the cruise missile (or similar) has crossed my mind; it would certainly help with the tracking for the hologram – I would think??!! |