Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?
Posted by: Bernard Allen
Date/Time: 09/07/15 00:32:00

There was some thought you could use it to slot in smaller lighter aircraft or light laden bigger aircraft while 27R was being used. but that was ruled out and it was closed 2002,

So the point is someone was thinking of using 23 although it didn't happen.

Its a pity that Heathrow was development in the centre. maybe if they built the terminals on North and South side it may of been easier to configure the runways, just a thought.  


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
was that a plane or ?07/07/15 19:11:00 Gary Watson
   Re:was that a plane or ?07/07/15 19:48:00 Keith Iddon
      'Quiet' planes07/07/15 22:09:00 Ken Munn
         Re:'Quiet' planes07/07/15 22:51:00 Richard Jennings
            Re:Re:'Quiet' planes08/07/15 14:30:00 Katrina Black
   Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 14:47:00 Richard Greenhough
      Re:Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 20:53:00 Gary Watson
         Re:Re:Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 21:57:00 Bernard Allen
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 22:34:00 Dave Robertson
   Re:was that a plane or ?08/07/15 22:40:00 Bernard Allen
      Re:Re:was that a plane or ?08/07/15 23:10:00 Bernard Allen
         Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?08/07/15 23:38:00 Dave Robertson
            Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 00:32:00 Bernard Allen
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 10:06:00 Dave Robertson
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 18:31:00 Bernard Allen
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 19:24:00 Richard Greenhough
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 21:07:00 Gary Watson

Forum Home