Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?
Posted by: Dave Robertson
Date/Time: 08/07/15 22:34:00

> If they left that runway there it could have been used for smaller aircraft or light load larger aircraft as it was shorter than the other two.

Keeping the cross runway open wouldn't have increased the capacity of the airport.

The clue is in the name, it crossed the other runways so when it was used it temporarily interrupted landings and takeoffs on those.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
was that a plane or ?07/07/15 19:11:00 Gary Watson
   Re:was that a plane or ?07/07/15 19:48:00 Keith Iddon
      'Quiet' planes07/07/15 22:09:00 Ken Munn
         Re:'Quiet' planes07/07/15 22:51:00 Richard Jennings
            Re:Re:'Quiet' planes08/07/15 14:30:00 Katrina Black
   Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 14:47:00 Richard Greenhough
      Re:Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 20:53:00 Gary Watson
         Re:Re:Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 21:57:00 Bernard Allen
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Best place for a new runway or two ?08/07/15 22:34:00 Dave Robertson
   Re:was that a plane or ?08/07/15 22:40:00 Bernard Allen
      Re:Re:was that a plane or ?08/07/15 23:10:00 Bernard Allen
         Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?08/07/15 23:38:00 Dave Robertson
            Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 00:32:00 Bernard Allen
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 10:06:00 Dave Robertson
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 18:31:00 Bernard Allen
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 19:24:00 Richard Greenhough
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:was that a plane or ?09/07/15 21:07:00 Gary Watson

Forum Home