| Topic: | Re:CRB/DBS checks | |
| Posted by: | James Danks | |
| Date/Time: | 10/10/14 14:35:00 |
| There are differing levels of (what was) the CRB that can be used depending on the position. For a basic check, spent convictions (depending on their severity) shouldn't come up. For jobs with greater responsibility, an enhanced check will generally be used that flags up more - I can't say I disagree with this policy. It certainly isn't a case that someone will be penalised for the rest of their lives for a minor mistake as these offences will either not be recordable or alternatively will not be flagged up once spent. Its rare to find a perfect solution to a problem but the CRB/DBS is a pretty good fit. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 11:09:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 13:20:00 | Viv Griffiths |
| Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 13:36:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 13:51:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 13:55:00 | Adrian Irving |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 14:31:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 14:35:00 | James Danks |
| Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 16:21:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 10/10/14 17:29:00 | Viv Griffiths |
| Re:CRB/DBS checks | 01/06/16 10:45:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 01/06/16 11:00:00 | Vanessa Smith |
| Re:Re:Re:CRB/DBS checks | 01/06/16 12:19:00 | Philippa Bond |