Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Grrrrrrrrrrrrr !  Thames *!*!*! Water :-((
Posted by: Richard Jennings
Date/Time: 07/04/15 18:00:00

"They eventually e-mail back advising me to ignore the letter and that they would send someone round to re-read the meter."

If I was in your situation and was told that, I would immediately go outside and read the meter myself.  That would establish instantly whether the last reading was plausible.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 15:59:00 Julian Pavey
   Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 16:14:00 Edward Przepiora
      Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 17:51:00 Michael Brown
   Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 18:29:00 David Turner
      Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 19:19:00 Susan Kelly
         Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 19:36:00 James Petri
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 20:01:00 Susan Kelly
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 21:45:00 Edward Przepiora
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water04/05/12 22:54:00 Julian Pavey
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water05/05/12 08:57:00 Colin Jordan
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water05/05/12 12:02:00 Jill Merrett
                           Re:Orpies Boy05/05/12 20:46:00 Roger Talbot
                              Re:Re:Orpies Boy08/05/12 15:49:00 Roger Talbot
                           Re: Thames Water meter06/05/12 08:58:00 Fay Kazemi
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water 06/05/12 10:12:00 Jean Ross
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water06/05/12 10:29:00 Guy Lambert
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water08/05/12 13:10:00 Brian Coyle
                               Assessed water charge 08/05/12 15:59:00 Jean Ross
                                 Attn Roger T08/05/12 16:14:00 Julian Pavey
                                    Re:Attn Roger T08/05/12 16:42:00 Brian Coyle
                                       Re:Re:Attn Roger T08/05/12 16:51:00 Julian Pavey
                                          Re:Re:Re:Attn Roger T08/05/12 19:09:00 Brian Coyle
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Attn Roger T08/05/12 20:23:00 Roger Talbot
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Attn Roger T08/05/12 20:37:00 Brian Coyle
                                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Attn Roger T09/05/12 09:37:00 Roger Talbot
   Rateable values08/05/12 20:41:00 David Turner
      Re:Rateable values08/05/12 20:43:00 David Turner
         Re:Re:Rateable values09/05/12 01:39:00 Jennifer Selig
         Re:Re:Rateable values09/05/12 09:37:00 Gail Busza
            Re:Re:Re:Rateable values09/05/12 12:16:00 Iain Muir
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Rateable values09/05/12 13:16:00 Richard Greenhough
   Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water 09/05/12 13:23:00 Richard Greenhough
      Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water 29/05/12 13:53:00 Julian Pavey
         Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water 29/05/12 13:57:00 Georgina Flint
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water 29/05/12 14:04:00 Richard Greenhough
         Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water - a theory29/05/12 14:00:00 Georgina Flint
         Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water 29/05/12 14:08:00 Robin Hester
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrr Thames Water 29/05/12 14:09:00 Richard Greenhough
   Re:Grrrrrrrrrrrrr !  Thames *!*!*! Water :-((07/04/15 16:33:00 Richard Greenhough
      Re:Re:Grrrrrrrrrrrrr !  Thames *!*!*! Water :-((07/04/15 18:00:00 Richard Jennings
         Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrrrrrrrrr !  Thames *!*!*! Water :-((07/04/15 18:23:00 Richard Greenhough
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Grrrrrrrrrrrrr !  Thames *!*!*! Water :-((07/04/15 19:59:00 Steve Taylor

Forum Home