Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Back Heathrow
Posted by: Ken Munn
Date/Time: 17/03/15 10:10:00

Their 'survey' contains tip-top examples of leading questions!

They proudly proclaim support from 80,000 local residents (many from boroughs not actually underneath existing flight paths) but neglect to mention how many of their 'surveys' have been returned which don't support LHR expansion – although the questions are so skewed it's difficult to make it clear that you are against expansion.

You can always return the pre-paid envelope empty - they have to pay postage, which is some small form of revenge for being woken by the 0448 flight from Adelaide.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Back Heathrow16/03/15 19:26:00 Rima Jones
   Re:Back Heathrow16/03/15 19:33:00 Claire Moran
   Re:Back Heathrow16/03/15 19:57:00 Tim Henderson
      Re:Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 10:10:00 Ken Munn
         Re:Re:Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 15:05:00 Russel Kaymer
   Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 10:53:00 Iris Hill
      Re:Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 11:29:00 Rima Jones
         Re:Re:Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 13:23:00 Rima Jones
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 14:09:00 Claudia Jachtmann
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 14:16:00 Rima Jones
   Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 13:42:00 Rima Jones
   Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 16:34:00 Iris Hill
      Re:Re:Back Heathrow17/03/15 17:46:00 Claire Moran
         Re:Re:Re:Back Heathro17/03/15 19:09:00 Rima Jones
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Back Heathro18/03/15 09:00:00 John Postlethwaite
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Back Heathro18/03/15 10:37:00 Richard Greenhough
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Back Heathrow - NOT19/03/15 22:50:00 Steve Taylor
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Back Heathrow - NOT20/03/15 09:39:00 Rima Jones

Forum Home