Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M4
Posted by: David McLoughlin
Date/Time: 21/06/15 12:51:00

I'm puzzled by two of the arguments in the last post.
'Stationary Traffic causes more harm to air quality than traffic that is moving'.
It's rarely stationary, more slow moving I think.  A car moving at 100Km per hour must use more fuel than a car moving at 20km per hour. Four lanes will enable  more traffic to use the motorway.
The economic benefits  ..sounds like the same arguments tat are being made for HS2. Which are dubious IMHO.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Widening of the M420/06/15 19:58:00 Rima Jones
   Re:Widening of the M420/06/15 20:04:00 Will Watson
      Re:Re:Widening of the M420/06/15 22:19:00 Rima Jones
         Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M421/06/15 08:09:00 Rima Jones
      Re:Re:Widening of the M420/06/15 23:35:00 Richard Jennings
         Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M421/06/15 09:34:00 Elizabeth Jane Daley
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M421/06/15 12:51:00 David McLoughlin
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M421/06/15 13:11:00 Rima Jones
         Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M421/06/15 20:35:00 Tim Henderson
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M406/09/16 18:14:00 Tim Henderson
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M406/09/16 18:29:00 Viv Griffiths
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Widening of the M407/09/16 00:07:00 Richard Jennings

Forum Home