So it is a code rather than a legal requirement? It may seem crazy but the building of this bridge has become something of a saga with four different organisations involved none of whom want to incur any ongoing expenses for maintaining the bridge. If the lift idea has been ditched because nobody wanted to pay for it, it may be the choice was between a bridge that was inaccessible to the disabled and no bridge at all. Given the station it leads to is inaccessible anyway this may have just been the pragmatic choice.

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Chiswick Park Footbridge Enters Latest Phase Of Development	17/05/18 09:55:00	Chris Calvi-Freeman
Re:Chiswick Park Footbridge Enters Latest Phase Of Development	17/05/18 10:11:00	David McLoughlin
Re:Re:Chiswick Park Footbridge Enters Latest Phase Of Development	17/05/18 10:18:00	Paul Fisher
Re:Re:Re:Chiswick Park Footbridge Enters Latest Phase Of Development	17/05/18 10:21:00	Paul Corcoran
Re:Re:Re:Re:Chiswick Park Footbridge Enters Latest Phase Of Development	17/05/18 10:25:00	Chris Calvi-Freeman
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Chiswick Park Footbridge Enters Latest Phase Of Development	17/05/18 10:31:00	Paul Corcoran
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Chiswick Park Footbridge Enters Latest Phase Of Development	17/05/18 11:21:00	Chris Calvi-Freeman
Chiswick business park bridge	17/05/18 11:23:00	John Todd
Re:Chiswick business park bridge	17/05/18 11:41:00	Chris Calvi-Freeman
Re:Re:Chiswick business park bridge	17/05/18 13:28:00	Al Webber
Chiswick business park bridge	17/05/18 13:33:00	John Todd
Re:Chiswick business park bridge	17/05/18 16:35:00	Jennifer Selig
Re:Re:Chiswick business park bridge	18/05/18 01:24:00	Marie-Louise Rabouhans
Re:Re:Re:Chiswick business park bridge	18/05/18 09:54:00	Chris Calvi-Freeman
Re:Re:Re:Re:Chiswick business park bridge	18/05/18 10:00:00	Jennifer Selig
Re:Re:Re:Re:Chiswick business park bridge	18/05/18 14:57:00	Michael Robinson

Forum Home