| Topic: | Reply | |
| Posted by: | Andrew OSullivan | |
| Date/Time: | 26/04/24 11:54:00 |
I don't see the logic of not designating Chiswick Tower as a Key Area subject to the Article 4 direction. The developer has a year to advance their plans without planning permission but if they fail to go through with the project the site remains open to alternative plans which the council might find less welcome. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 14:54:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
| Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 16:17:00 | Jim Lawes |
| Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 17:35:00 | Peter Evans |
| Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 17:42:00 | Michael Robinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 18:49:00 | Justin Stephenson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 20/04/24 14:19:00 | Peter Evans |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 21/04/24 09:41:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 21/04/24 12:46:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Reply | 21/04/24 13:36:00 | Michael Robinson |
| Re:Reply | 23/04/24 08:08:00 | Mark Evans |
| Reply | 26/04/24 11:54:00 | Andrew OSullivan |
| Re:Reply | 30/04/24 12:33:00 | Mark Evans |