| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | |
| Posted by: | Jeremy Parkinson | |
| Date/Time: | 21/04/24 09:41:00 |
| Pocket seems to be a good landlord who hasn't exploited their position as freeholder in their developments but this unfortunately is increasingly rare. One interesting snippet I overlooked in the article on the Chiswick Tower development is that it has been excluded as a key site in the Article 4 direction on permitted development. This suggests strongly that discussions have already been held with the council which has agreed in principle to the change of use to housing. No planning permission required means no planning gain and therefore no money for station improvements. There are no details on the car park development but it is a big site so even with an affordable component, it may be able to deliver new access. As far as I can work out, if it doesn't happen with this development, it never will. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 14:54:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
| Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 16:17:00 | Jim Lawes |
| Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 17:35:00 | Peter Evans |
| Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 17:42:00 | Michael Robinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 19/04/24 18:49:00 | Justin Stephenson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 20/04/24 14:19:00 | Peter Evans |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 21/04/24 09:41:00 | Jeremy Parkinson |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Good news/bad news on Chiswick Tower | 21/04/24 12:46:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Reply | 21/04/24 13:36:00 | Michael Robinson |
| Re:Reply | 23/04/24 08:08:00 | Mark Evans |
| Reply | 26/04/24 11:54:00 | Andrew OSullivan |
| Re:Reply | 30/04/24 12:33:00 | Mark Evans |