Andy, you fail to mention that Richard Gage & Co. of AE911Truth also claim that the towers were blown up, which is pretty obvious because there is plenty of footage showing them being blown up. This is, arguably, the most important point to acknowledge about the towers at this moment in time as it shows the official story to be a lie. NIST didn’t even include the ‘collapse’ in their fraudulent report. You’ve not supported your claim that AE911Truth take Dr. Wood’s claims apart with any evidence, and neither have you refuted any claims made by Dr. Wood in her book as I invited you to do so. AE911Truth give no explanation for the destruction of hundreds of vehicles within the vicinity of the WTC, mainly through self-combustion and engine disintegration, presumably because it doesn’t fit in with the theory that they want us to believe. Why would they not cover something as significant as this? I’m with Dr. Wood on this. Whilst AE911Truth probably have many genuine members, those that run it are likely to be controlled opposition. The US government knew the cat was out of the bag a long time ago – there is simply too much evidence; so the next option is damage limitation. Just as the 9/11 lie changed the world, so would proof of free energy. It would prove that we do not need to be enslaved to the oil companies and show that the climate change concerns to be another scam as free clean energy is available to us all.
I invite you, again, to point towards any evidence that Dr. Wood presents, which you claim to be incorrect. Also, if you support the claims made by AE911Truth then, presumably, you believe that the towers were not destroyed as a result of planes hitting them but by a form of controlled demolition. Is this correct?
|