| Topic: | Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | |
| Posted by: | Diana Claridge | |
| Date/Time: | 18/09/15 12:00:00 |
| That's really strange - it's changed over night literally! It's gone back to saying the group does not qualify under Lcalism Act. - maybe someone from that group can clarify? No one says this is going to be easy - but it may just prompt the freeholder (who won't communicate with residents) into actually doing something rather than just sitting on their hands, putting potential tenants off or expecting an exorbitant amount for the freehold! |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Save Pissarros? | 17/09/15 16:18:00 | Carl Wynne |
| Re:Save Pissarros? | 17/09/15 16:57:00 | Diana Claridge |
| Re:Save Pissarros? | 17/09/15 16:59:00 | Jonathan Bingham |
| Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | 17/09/15 17:46:00 | Claire Moran |
| Re:Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | 18/09/15 10:55:00 | Rima Jones |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | 18/09/15 10:57:00 | Paul Wright |
| Re:Save Pissarros? | 18/09/15 11:48:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | 18/09/15 12:00:00 | Diana Claridge |
| Re:Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | 18/09/15 12:04:00 | Loraine Pemberton |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | 18/09/15 12:35:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Save Pissarros? | 18/09/15 13:55:00 | Cecile Parfitt |