| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:South West Trains | |
| Posted by: | Thomas Barry | |
| Date/Time: | 01/05/15 17:18:00 |
| Thanks, Richard, I was just about to call Greenhough out for the usual clanging ignorance, but you put it more eloquently. SWT is the nearest thing* to rolling back the damaging operational fragmentation caused by rail privatisation, being a public private alliance with a single operating model and joint operating team. They emphasis teamwork and focus on the railway rather than trying to pretend competition matters more than co-operation and everything is best sorted out via contracts and lawyers. Applying your favourite public/private sector ideological preference to railways without adequate research usually ends up tripping over something important. So don't. * Other than London Overground, which is a private company** delivering a public service to a public sector specification, by TfL. ** Except that it's co-owned by the state railways of Germany and Hong Kong |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| South west trains | 01/05/15 13:52:00 | Peter Milligan |
| Re:South west trains | 01/05/15 14:06:00 | Dan Murphy |
| Re:South West Trains | 01/05/15 14:17:00 | Richard Greenhough |
| Re:Re:South West Trains | 01/05/15 15:51:00 | Jonathan Bingham |
| Re:Re:South West Trains | 01/05/15 16:42:00 | Richard Jennings |
| Re:Re:Re:South West Trains | 01/05/15 17:18:00 | Thomas Barry |
| Re:South West Trains | 03/05/15 18:12:00 | Richard Greenhough |