Topic: | Re:Re:Re:CGI Plane or Projected Imagery? | |
Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
Date/Time: | 18/04/15 14:24:00 |
“You have zero to extremely limited knowledge on either so how do you get to choose one over the other?” If the plane was created by CGI, I would have thought they would have done a better job - The plane is seen approaching the South tower during a relatively long sequence of footage where the plane appears to be black, yet the plane is being filmed side-on in direct sunlight. Commercial airliners do not appear to be black in direct sunlight whether viewed from near or far. With CGI, they could have used light and colour to properly imitate a real plane in direct sunlight. Other footage shows wings going missing and distortion of the underside of the plane, which isn’t consistent with a CGI production. However, if we’re looking at some form of projected imagery, whether it be a cloaked missile or 100% projected imagery, a reasonable explanation for the inconsistencies would be that they have not yet developed the technology to a level, which can completely fool us… not all of us, anyway. |