Topic: | Re:Full forensic examination | |
Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
Date/Time: | 16/04/15 11:05:00 |
Jonathan, I’m not aware of any published data by Dr Judy Wood on the dust content. Perhaps she did analyse it and found it simply to be dust. Did NIST analyse the dust? I don’t think so – they just told us that the buildings collapsed. Dr Steven Jones and Dr Harriet say they analysed the dust and found traces of thermite. Do their assertions convince you that the towers were brought down by thermite based weaponry as they claim? If so, you/they still have some way to go to explain the many anomalies that Dr Wood’s research covers. One thing they do all agree on is that the towers were destroyed by a form of weaponry, and did not suddenly collapse into a hole into the ground directly below them as you ridiculously suggest. And then there’s Building 7 – another vertical collapse, and at near freefall rate, and no plane is even claimed to have hit that. No steel framed building had ever collapsed prior to 9/11 yet we had three on that day (the towers exploded), and we only saw a few small fires dotted around. If you’re stupid enough to believe the official story – fine, but it’s not supported by any credible evidence. Anyway, I’m already being accused by DTS of changing the thread to a 9/11 thread when Frank swerved it towards 9/11…. and the moonlandings. |