Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Only in America ... | |
Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
Date/Time: | 29/08/14 07:26:00 |
It’s not about whether hoax theories are true or false; they can’t be grouped together. Any serious crime needs to be properly investigated to establish what, exactly, happened and by whom, and this process usually takes a considerable amount of time, sometimes with the crime not being solved. With false flag operations, this process is not followed. The ‘culprits’ are identified very quickly and they and their crimes are announced to the nation, often on the same day, without any real investigation ever taking place. The latest example of this ploy is the MH17 fiasco where all evidence points to something very different having happened to what we were told; but the sanctions would have been planned in advance so nothing was going to stop them being put into place. The evidence was irrelevant. The best example, though, is 9/11. This has everything, especially in terms of evidence. In respect of the towers, all scientists that have studied this event (other than those working to protect the US government – NIST) agree that the towers were not brought down as a result of planes hitting them; they just argue about the type of weapon used to bring them down. Dr Judy Wood comes under the most fire and gets ridiculed the most, yet her theory is the only one that fits in with all of the evidence. And then there’s Building 7, a 47 floor skyscraper, which collapsed into its own footprint at the rate of free fall; and no plane. It doesn’t get any simpler, BUT... it must've been Bin Laden!! |