Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:burden of proof | |
Posted by: | Michael Brown | |
Date/Time: | 13/08/14 18:11:00 |
Yes, it’s interesting, Brian, that those that rubbish everything never address the evidence put forward, or present any of their own; but that’s not altogether a bad thing, for obvious reasons. Andy, you may well be right about the guns, as I don’t know much about them whereas you obviously do; but with the attackers wearing bullet proof vests, I don’t suppose it mattered much. Pete, I read the article by Chris Spivey, which you gave a link to. Very interesting, and it seems that he has researched the subject very thoroughly, including the background of ‘Lee Rigby’ and family members. I’ve not done such research, but his assertion that no-one died in Artillery Place that day makes sense - It fits in with all the evidence that we see, and it would have been easy for Cameron, The Queen etc. to sign off - The British establishment gets what they want out of it, as do the family of a soldier who probably died a year prior in Afghanistan, and the ‘Help for Heroes’ charity does alright too. The only losers are us, again… |