| Topic: | Re:Re:Katherine Dunne's ridiculously expensive e-bike policy | Forum Home |
| Posted by: | Andrew Jones | |
| Date/Time: | 01/03/26 21:16:00 |
| The question is, why would Hounslow choose to not invite Lime back in now that the contracts with Forest and the other provider have bedded in? According to what David has written previously there is nothing to stop them, and Hounslow would end up with more money. Methinks it’s because they wouldn’t be able to do so without having to accept less money from the people they’ve signed contracts with and/or the contracts signed must have had some sort of exclusivity clause. Is there any other plausible reason? |