Forum Message

Topic: Re:Two child benefit limit
Posted by: Richard Greenhough
Date/Time: 01/12/25 15:51:00

"I agreed with the scrapping of the two child family benefit limit..."

It would have been much better if the child family benefit system had been overhauled, with vouchers being provided to parents that could only be spent on certain defined items that would benefit the children. Instead, just giving more money to parents with additional children that they can spend as they like is unlikely to have a positive impact on child poverty.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Rachel Reeves30/11/25 15:09:00 Denis I. Fox
   Re:Rachel Reeves30/11/25 19:11:00 Peter Evans
      Re:Re:Rachel Reeves30/11/25 19:35:00 Michael Brown
         Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves30/11/25 20:25:00 Steve Taylor
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves30/11/25 21:11:00 Chris Dakers
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 11:09:00 Steve Taylor
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 11:35:00 Nicholas Beard
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 11:37:00 David Turner
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 12:30:00 Jayne Thorburn
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 12:53:00 Philippa Bond
               Re:Two child benefit limit01/12/25 15:51:00 Richard Greenhough
                  Re:Re:Two child benefit limit01/12/25 16:12:00 Paul James
                     Re:Re:Re:Two child benefit limit01/12/25 16:55:00 Richard Greenhough
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Two child benefit limit01/12/25 16:59:00 Janice Evans
   Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 12:55:00 Vanessa Smith
      Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 13:03:00 Jayne Thorburn
         Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 13:37:00 Janice Evans
         Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 14:06:00 Vanessa Smith
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 18:04:00 Denis I. Fox
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 18:53:00 Vanessa Smith
      Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 13:09:00 Peter Evans
         Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 13:32:00 Janice Evans
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 14:41:00 Jayne Thorburn
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 15:54:00 N V Brooks
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 16:15:00 Jayne Thorburn
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 16:21:00 Jayne Thorburn
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 20:10:00 Janice Evans
   Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 16:11:00 Paul James
      Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 16:28:00 Keith Iddon
         Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 16:43:00 Steve Taylor
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 16:48:00 Paul James
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 17:30:00 N V Brooks
         Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 16:49:00 Paul James
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 17:00:00 Keith Iddon
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 18:13:00 Jayne Thorburn
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 18:59:00 Vanessa Smith
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 19:15:00 Paul James
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 19:50:00 Jayne Thorburn
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 19:52:00 Paul James
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 20:22:00 Steve Taylor
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 21:35:00 Keith Iddon
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 22:15:00 Andrew Jones
                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 22:41:00 Keith Iddon
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Rachel Reeves01/12/25 21:36:00 Jayne Thorburn

Forum Home