Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Piccadilly Line chaos (ES letters Tues 19/01/16)
Posted by: Michael Robinson
Date/Time: 20/01/16 10:48:00

TfL has also shot itself in the foot with the debacle regarding "sub-surface" line re-signalling (the sub-surface lines are District, Circle, Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan) as the current project is the third attempt at this.

First attempt was meant to be done under a Public Private Partnership which went tits up so this can be blamed on government policy pushing PPPs rather than TfL.

Second attempt, TfL selected a supplier who couldn't deliver a working solution so they needed to change suppliers and this put dates back further.

They are currently on the  third attempt but there has been a delay of 5+ years (depending how you count this...) and this has had a knock-on affect delaying Piccadilly line re-signalling and new trains for Piccadilly/Bakerloo/W&C/Central lines.

Even if money was available, there aren't the resources to do both District and Piccadilly line re-signalling at the same time as you just can't magic the people with skills, knowledge and expertise to do this out of thin air.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Piccadilly Line chaos (ES letters Tues 19/01/16)20/01/16 08:55:00 George Turner
   Re:Piccadilly Line chaos (ES letters Tues 19/01/16)20/01/16 10:16:00 Paul Fisher
      Re:Re:Piccadilly Line chaos (ES letters Tues 19/01/16)20/01/16 10:48:00 Michael Robinson
         Re:Re:Re:Piccadilly Line chaos (ES letters Tues 19/01/16)20/01/16 12:25:00 Christopher Bell
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Piccadilly Line chaos (ES letters Tues 19/01/16)20/01/16 16:49:00 Micki Hawkes
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Piccadilly Line chaos (ES letters Tues 19/01/16)20/01/16 22:12:00 Paul Smithson

Forum Home